The Nigerian Army has refuted claims by a former soldier, Rotimi Olamilekan, who alleged that troops are responsible for purchasing their own uniforms and protective gear.
In a statement issued by its Acting Director of Army Public Relations, Appolonia Anele, the Army described the allegations as misleading and inaccurate, maintaining that personnel are properly equipped and supported.
The response followed a viral interview in which Olamilekan, also known as Soja Boi, claimed soldiers spend personal funds on essential items such as uniforms, boots, and bulletproof vests despite earning relatively low salaries.
The Army, however, insisted that its remuneration structure includes salaries and additional allowances.
“In addition to consolidated monthly salaries, personnel are entitled to uniform allowances and other allowances, which are periodically paid directly into their accounts,” it said.
It further explained that soldiers deployed for operations receive extra financial support.
“Personnel serving in operational theatres… are also paid operational allowances and other mission-specific entitlements designed to support their welfare and enhance operational effectiveness,” the statement added.
Addressing the main allegation, the Army firmly denied that soldiers are required to purchase their own equipment.
“The claim that soldiers are required to purchase uniforms and protective equipment, including bulletproof vests and helmets, is entirely false. The provision of uniforms, kits, arms, ammunition, and operational gear is an institutional responsibility executed through established logistics systems,” it stated.
While acknowledging that some personnel may choose to supplement their kits, the Army said such actions are optional and not due to any system failure.
“While some personnel may choose to supplement issued kits based on personal preference and comfort, such actions are voluntary and do not indicate any systemic failure,” the Army said.
The statement also reassured the public that soldiers are not deployed without adequate protection.
“For the avoidance of doubt, no soldier is deployed to an operational theatre without the necessary protective equipment,” it added.
The Army urged Nigerians to ignore the claims, warning that such narratives could negatively impact morale and national security.
“The public is requested to disregard these baseless allegations… Citizens are urged to refrain from amplifying unverified claims that may undermine these institutions,” the statement said.
It also clarified that Olamilekan’s dismissal was due to disciplinary issues, not his public comments.
“The Nigerian Army categorically states that Mr Olamilekan was not dismissed for ‘speaking the truth’ or expressing opinions on political leadership. He was dismissed following persistent and grave acts of indiscipline, including violations of the Armed Forces Social Media Policy,” the statement read.
