The Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD) has raised concerns over a recent directive issued by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), cautioning that it could have far-reaching implications for press freedom and civic space in Nigeria.
In a statement released on Sunday and signed by its Executive Director, Y. Z. Ya’u, the organisation described the directive as part of a broader pattern that threatens freedom of expression and media independence.
“This directive represents a dangerous escalation in the ongoing erosion of press freedom and civic space in the country,” the statement said.
While the directive has been presented as a regulatory measure, CITAD argued that its potential impact extends beyond routine oversight, raising concerns about democratic accountability and digital rights.
The organisation pointed out that, in a period marked by complex political and social challenges, the media remains a vital platform for citizens to question authority and demand transparency. It warned that any attempt to restrict this role could weaken public discourse.
CITAD also criticised the lack of clarity in the directive, noting that its provisions are open to interpretation and could be misapplied.
“It introduces vague and subjective standards that could be weaponised to silence critical voices,” it said.
According to the group, restrictions on how broadcasters interact with guests, present analysis, or shape discussions could create an atmosphere of caution and fear within the media landscape.
“By attempting to restrict how broadcasters engage with guests, express analysis, or frame public discourse, the government risks creating an environment of fear,” it added.
The organisation further faulted the NBC for failing to clearly define the issues raised in the directive, arguing that this ambiguity creates room for arbitrary enforcement.
“These concepts are left at the level of mere ideas without a shared understanding, opening the door for arbitrary application,” the statement noted.
CITAD stressed that policies with such significant implications should not be introduced unilaterally. Instead, it called for a consultative approach that includes media professionals, civil society organisations, and other stakeholders.
“Such an important notice should be the outcome of a consultative process involving relevant stakeholders, not a unilateral decision from a regulatory body,” it said.
Beyond traditional media, the organisation warned that the directive could signal broader attempts to regulate information flow across digital platforms as well.
“Any attempt to stifle media freedom inevitably affects the broader digital civic space,” CITAD said, noting that journalists, activists, young people, and marginalised communities could be disproportionately affected.
The group emphasised that open debate and diverse perspectives are essential to a functioning democracy, cautioning against efforts to limit critical engagement.
“Democratic societies thrive on plurality of opinions and robust debate. Efforts to impose artificial neutrality weaken public discourse,” it said.
CITAD called on the Federal Government to withdraw the directive and engage in meaningful dialogue with stakeholders to ensure that any regulatory measures respect fundamental rights.
“NBC cannot sit in its boardroom and unilaterally decide what should be allowed on the airwaves,” the statement said.
It also urged regulatory bodies to align their actions with constitutional protections and international human rights standards, particularly those relating to freedom of expression.
With the country approaching another election cycle, CITAD warned that safeguarding media independence is crucial to maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.
“Any attempt to curtail press freedom at this critical moment risks compromising the integrity of the democratic process,” it added.
